Kritikan terhadap Wikipedia

Wikipedia sebuah projek untuk membuat ensiklopedia bebas telah dikritik disebabkan pendekatankanya yang boleh disunting sesiapa sahaja menyebabkan ia kurang dipercayai pengguna. Antara masalah lain yang dikritik adalah:

• Setiap orang boleh menyunting rencana di Wikipedia. Ini bermakna sukar untuk mengatakan sesuatu yang tertulis di Wikipedia adalah benar, atau tepat.
• Ada masalah Laku musnah. Beberapa laku musnah adalah jelas, bentuk-bentuk lain daripada laku musnah mungkin agak sulit untuk melihat.
• Kadang-kadang orang-orang yang mempunyai pendapat yang kuat tentang suatu subjek akan cuba untuk mengendalikan rencana tentang subjek tersebut.
• Hal-hal yang dinyatakan dalam artikel mesti mempunyai sumber-sumber yang boleh dipercayai, terutamanya jika ada kontroversi tentang mereka. Sering kali ada tuntutan dalam pasal kontroversi, tanpa sumber yang layak.
• Beberapa editor tidak suka satu sama lain; mereka akan melakukan hal-hal yang tidak menjadikan wikipedia lebih baik (seperti perang sunting).

Hanya sekelompok orang tertentu menyunting Wikipedia. Untuk alasan ini, pendapat kumpulan, dan kepentingan mereka dapat terpelihara lebih di Wikipedia. Hal ini biasanya disebut sistem bias, dan medatangkan kesan yang buruk. Ada juga beberapa bentuk kumpulan dinamik yang hadir. Ini bererti bahawa kumpulan penyunting secara keseluruhan lebih sibuk untuk menyenangkan dirinya sendiri daripada untuk menyunting arti

Pautan Luar

• Is something fundamentally wrong with Wikipedia governance processes? February 27, 2008
• Wikipedia is a real-life Hitchhiker's Guide: huge, nerdy, and imprecise - by Paul Boutin, Slate, May 3, 2005.
• Wikipedia target of House 'editors' - by Evan Lehmann, TheTranscript.com, January 30, 2006.
• A thirst for knowledge by Andrew Orlowski The Guardian April 13, 2006
• Wikipedia: magic, monkeys and typewriters - by Andrew Orlowski, The Register, October 24, 2005.
• Can you trust Wikipedia? - by Elvira van Noort, Mail & Guardian (South Africa), November 7, 2005.
• "The Danger of Wikipedia", Editor and Publisher, November 30, 2005. (Login required)
• Unreliable (adj): log on and see - by Rosemary Righter, The Times, December 9, 2005
• Online encyclopedias put to the test - by Stephen Cauchi, December 14, 2005.
• Wikipedia science 31% more cronky than Britannica's - by Andrew Orlowski, The Register, December 16, 2005.
• "Wikipedia founder admits to serious quality problems" - by Andrew Orlowski, The Register, December 18, 2005.
• Does Wikipedia win through the "wisdom of crowds"? by Jack Schofield Guardian Unlimited December 19, 2005
• Turf Wars: Wikipedia spars with a splinter site for truth Diarkibkan 2008-07-19 di Wayback Machine by Julian Dibbell The Village Voice May 2, 2006
• Wikipedia Founder Looks Out for Number 1 - by Rogers Cadenhead, December 19, 2005.
• Wikipedia target of House 'editors' - by Evan Lehmann, TheTranscript.com, January 30, 2006.
• Profs knock Wikipedia Diarkibkan 2007-10-13 di Wayback Machine - by Brittany Anas, February 6, 2006. (Login required)
• The Great Failure of Wikipedia (transcript) by Jason Scott Sadofsky at Notacon 3 in Cleveland, Ohio
• The Wikipedia FAQK, Wired article that provides sarcastic advice to new Wikipedia contributors. April 19, 2006
• Neil Gaiman: What Bears Do On the Lawn, May 11, 2006, criticism of Wikipedia by noted author and essayist Neil Gaiman.
• "U. Florida cops ask fiction writer for fingerprints, DNA" Diarkibkan 2006-07-18 di Wayback Machine, boingboing, May 22, 2006, retrieved May 25, 2006.
• Wikis Are a Waste of Time by Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols eWeek May 22, 2006
• The death of Wikipedia by Nicholas Carr May 24, 2006
• Now, let's bury the myth by Nicholas Carr May 25, 2006
• Wikipedia Celebrates 750 Years Of American IndependenceDiarkibkan 2011-08-23 di Wayback Machine The Onion's satirical view July 26, 2006
• How wiki-wiki can get sticky by Ben Macintyre The Times July 21, 2006
• Segal, David (December 3, 2006). "Our love/hate relationship with Wikipedia". Washington Post.
• McNamara, Paul (December 3, 2006). "Look Me Up Under 'Missing Link'". NetworkWorld.
• "The Shiny Diamonds 1". On the Coast. 2006-12-19. 165 minit pada. CBC Radio. CBC Radio One.
• "The Shiny Diamonds 2". On the Coast. 2006-12-20. 105 minit pada. CBC Radio. CBC Radio One.
• "Stabbing Polonius" Diarkibkan 2008-05-12 di Wayback Machine by Nicholas Carr April 27, 2007
• Sand Castles of Knowledge by Kyle Gann May 5, 2007
• "Wikipedia: A Million Monkeys Typing" Editorial note from Workers Vanguard, biweekly newspaper of the Spartacist League/US
• "Communiqué from Wikiality" Letter and response from Workers Vanguard on Wikipedia
• The Book Stops Here Wired News article

---

Jika anda melihat rencana yang menggunakan templat {{tunas}} ini, gantikanlah ia dengan templat tunas yang lebih spesifik.