Undi pos: Perbezaan antara semakan
Kandungan dihapus Kandungan ditambah
kembang |
|||
Baris 5:
Akan tetapi, terdapat kebimbangan terhadap undi pos yang telah ditimbulkan, iaitu sama ada ia selaras dengan syarat undi rahsia, kerana undi itu dibuang di luar kawalan keselamatan pusat mengundi, dan sama ada pengundi dapat mengundi pilihan mereka dengan bebas tanpa manipulasi atau paksaan mana-mana pihak. Pernah terjadi kes [[penipuan pilihan raya]] dengan pengundi pos di beberapa tempat seperti di United Kingdom.<ref name="Judge upholds vote-rigging claims">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/west_midlands/4406575.stm |title=Judge upholds vote-rigging claims |publisher=BBC News |date=2005-04-04 |accessdate=2010-09-19}}</ref><ref name="politics.guardian.co.uk">{{cite news |author=Hugh Muir, Sandra Laville dan Audrey Gillan |url=http://politics.guardian.co.uk/election/story/0,15803,1458341,00.html |title=New fears over postal vote fraud |publisher=Politics.guardian.co.uk |date= 2005-04-13 |accessdate=2010-09-19 |location=London}}</ref>
== Lihat juga ==
* [[Undi awal]]
== Rujukan ==
{{Reflist}}
== Pautan luar ==
*[http://oregonvotes.org/pages/voterresources/voteinoregon/vbm/index.html Oregon state page on vote-by-mail]
*[http://www.american.edu/ia/cfer/research/csae_09132004.pdf American University study finding vote-by-mail harmful]
*[http://novbm.wordpress.com/ No Vote By Mail, Problems with Absentee, Postal, and Vote-by-mail systems]
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40032-2004Dec31.html "Vote-by-Mail: The Real Winner Is Democracy," oleh Bill Bradbury, Washington Post, 31 Disember 2004]
*[http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/opinion/09arvin.html "Voting Alone," oleh Nick Arvin, New York Times, 8 November 2008]
*[http://www.tobysjames.com/election_administration_1.html Research about postal voting and electoral practices]
| |||