Wikipedia:Kelayakan: Perbezaan antara semakan

Kandungan dihapus Kandungan ditambah
Kurniasan (bincang | sumb.)
kTiada ringkasan suntingan
Yosri (bincang | sumb.)
Baris 10:
A '''topic''' is ''presumed'' to be notable if it has received significant coverage in [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that are [[Wikipedia:Verifiability#Sources|independent]] of the subject.
 
* ''"PresumedDianggap"'' meansbererti objectivebukti evidenceobjektif meetsmemenuhi the criteriakriteria, without regard fortanpa themengambil subjectivekira personalpertimbangan judgmentsperibadi ofsubjektif editorspenyunting.<ref>Tidak dikenali (''Non-notability'') isadalah aangapan [[bantahan (''rebuttable presumption]]'') basedberasaskan onlykekurangan onbukti a lack of suitable evidence of notabilitydikenali, whichyang becomesmenjadi moottidak oncebernilai evidenceapabila isbukti founddijumpai. ItIa istidak notmungkin possiblemembuktikan to prove nontidak-notabilitypenting becausekerana thatia wouldmemerlukan requirebukti a [[negative proof]]negetif.</ref> SubstantiveBanyak coveragelitupan indalam [[WP:RS|reliablesumber sourcesdipercauai]] suggestsmembuktikan thatbahawa thesubjek subjectadalah is notablepenting.<ref>HoweverBagaimanapun, manybanyak subjectssubjek presumedyang todianggap be notablepenting ''may still notmungkin bemasih'' worthytidak ofperlu inclusiondimasukkan &ndash; theyia failgagal [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not|What Wikipedia is not]], or the coverage does not actually support notability when examined. For example, directories and databases, advertisements, announcements columns, minor news stories, and coverage with low levels of discrimination, are all examples of information that may not be evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation, despite their existence as [[WP:RS|reliable sources]].</ref>
* ''"Significant coverage"'' means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and [[Wikipedia:No original research|no original research]] is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive.<ref>Examples: The 360-page book by Sobel and the 528-page book by Black on [[IBM]] are plainly non-trivial. The one sentence mention by Walker of the band ''Three Blind Mice'' in a biography of [[Bill Clinton]] ({{cite news|title=Tough love child of Kennedy|author=Martin Walker|date=[[1992-01-06]]|work=[[The Guardian]]|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,1240962,00.html}}) is plainly trivial.</ref>
* ''"Reliable"'' means sources need editorial integrity to allow [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|verifiable]] evaluation of notability, per [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|the reliable source guideline]]. Sources may encompass [[Publication|published]] works in all forms and media. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject are a good test for notability.<ref>Self-promotion, autobiography, and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopedia article. The published works should be ''someone else'' writing independently about the topic. (See [[Wikipedia:Autobiography]] for the attribution and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material. Also see [[Wikipedia:Independent sources]].) The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it. </ref>