Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Hak cipta: Perbezaan antara semakan

Layar sejarah secara interaktif
← Suntingan sebelumnyaSuntingan berikutnya →
Kandungan dihapus Kandungan ditambah
VisualWikiteks
Tiada ringkasan suntingan
Aurora (bincang | sumb.)
Birokrat, Penyelia
65,453 suntingan
kemaskini
Baris 1:
Matlamat [[Wikipedia]] adalah mencipta sumber maklumat dalam bentuk ensiklopedia secara percuma. Lesen yang kami guna memberikan capaian percuma kepada kandungan kami seperti aturcara (software) percuma dilesenkan. Oleh itu kandungan Wikipedia boleh disalin, disunting, dan disebarkan selagi versi baru memberikan kebebasan yang sama kepada orang lain dan mengakui Wikipedia sebagai sumber. Oleh itu, rencana Wikipedia kekal percuma selamanya dan boleh digunakan oleh sesiapapun tertakluk kepada beberapa syarat, yang bertujuan mengekalkan kebebasan tersebut.▼
<!--<h1>Wikipedia:Hakcipta</h1> -->
 
Daripada Wikipedia, ensiklopedia percuma.
 
▲Matlamat Wikipedia adalah mencipta sumber maklumat dalam bentuk ensiklopedia secara percuma. Lesen yang kami guna memberikan capaian percuma kepada kandungan kami seperti aturcara (software) percuma dilesenkan. Oleh itu kandungan Wikipedia boleh disalin, disunting, dan disebarkan selagi versi baru memberikan kebebasan yang sama kepada orang lain dan mengakui Wikipedia sebagai sumber. Oleh itu, rencana Wikipedia kekal percuma selamanya dan boleh digunakan oleh sesiapapun tertakluk kepada beberapa syarat, yang bertujuan mengekalkan kebebasan tersebut.
 
Untuk memenuhi matlamat tersebut, teks terkandung dalam Wikipedia dilesenkan kepada umum di bawah Lesen Dokumen Percuma GNU "GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL)". Teks penuh berkenaan lesen ini terdapat di Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License.
Baris 13 ⟶ 9:
PENTING: Jika anda ingin menggunakan kandungan Wikipedia, baca terlebih dahulu seksyen hak dan tanggungjawab Pengguna. Anda kemudian perlu membaca Lesen Dokumen Percuma GNU "GNU Free Documentation License".
 
<!---'''Kandungan:'''
 
1 Hak dan tanggungjawab Pengguna
 
1.1 Contoh pemberitahuan
 
1.2 Bahan Fair use dan keperluan khusus.
 
2 Garis panduan Gambar
 
2.1 Karya asli oleh pengarang Wikipedia
 
2.2 Gambar hasil kerja seni lama
 
2.3 Gambar terkemuka
 
2.4 Gambar kerajaan
 
2.5 Gambar bintang
 
3 Hak penyumbang dan tanggungjawab
 
3.1 Menggunakan hasil hakcipta orang lain
 
3.2 Sambungan kepada hasil hakcipta
 
3.3 Jika anda menjumpai pencerobohan hakcipta
4 Lihat juga--->▼
 
'''== Hak dan tanggung jawab pengguna''' ==▼
▲ 4 Lihat juga
 
 
▲'''Hak dan tanggung jawab pengguna'''
 
Jika anda ingin menggunakan bahan Wikipedia di dalam buku/rencana/laman web atau sebarang terbitan, anda boleh melakukannya, tetapi anda perlu mematuhi GFDL, seperti berikut:
Baris 54 ⟶ 35:
If you create a derivative version by changing or adding content, you need to both acknowledge authorship and provide access to a transparent copy of the new text.
 
===Contoh pemberitahuan===
Example notice
 
An example notice, which complies correctly with the GFDL, for an article that uses the Wikipedia article Foo might read as follows:
Baris 64 ⟶ 45:
Alternatively you can distribute your copy of Foo along with a copy of the GFDL (as explained in the text) and list at least five (or all if less than five) principal authors on the title page (or top of the document).
 
===Bahan Fair use dan keperluan khusus===
Fair use materials and special requirements
 
Occasionally, Wikipedia articles may include images, sounds, or text quotes used under the "fair use" doctrine. In this case, the material should be identified as from an external source (on the image description page, or history page, as appropriate). However, what is fair for us to use may not be fair for your intended use of the media.
Baris 72 ⟶ 53:
Wikipedia does use some text under licenses that are compatible with the GFDL but may require additional terms that we do not require for original Wikipedia text (such as including Invariant Sections, Front-Cover Texts, or Back-Cover Texts). When using these materials, you have to include those invariant sections verbatim.
 
== Garis panduan gambar ==
Image guidelines
 
Images and photographs, like written works, are subject to copyright. Someone owns them unless they have been explictly placed in the public domain. Images on the internet need to be licensed directly from the copyright holder or someone able to license on their behalf. In some cases, fair use guidelines may allow a photograph to be used.
 
Original===Karya workasli byoleh pengarang Wikipedia editor ===
 
Awesome. You rock!
 
===Gambar hasil kerja seni lama===
Photographs of old works of art
 
Add guidelines here.
 
examples: Mona Lisa, Michelangelo's David
 
===Gambar terkemuka===
Famous photographs
 
Add guidelines here.
 
examples: the Hindenburg disaster, Charles Lindbergh, etc.
 
===Gambar kerajaan===
Government photographs
 
Not all photographs on .gov and .mil sites are public domain. Please be careful to check ownership information before copying.
 
===Gambar bintang===
Celebrity photographs
 
This is based on the image guidelines at IMDB, so it especially applies to celebrity photographs, but also can apply to other pictures. Legitimate photographs generally come from three different places with permission.
Baris 102 ⟶ 83:
1.The studios, producers, magazine publisher, or media outlet that originally shot the photograph.
 
2.Agencies that represent the photographers who shot the photos or the photographer themself (the latter especially for amateur photographs)
 
3.Submissions from the celebrity themselves or a legal representatives of the celebrity.
 
== Hak penyumbang dan tanggungjawab ==
Contributors' rights and obligations
 
If you contribute material to Wikipedia, you thereby license it to the public under the GFDL (with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). In order to contribute, you therefore must be in a position to grant this license, which means that either you own the copyright to the material, for instance because you produced it yourself, or you acquired the material from a source that allows the licensing under GFDL, for instance because the material is in the public domain or is itself published under GFDL.
 
In the first case, you retain copyright to your materials. You can later republish and relicense them in any way you like. However, you can never retract the GFDL license for the versions you placed here: that material will remain under GFDL forever. In the second case, if you incorporate external GFDL materials, as a requirement of the GFDL, you need to acknowledge the authorship and provide a link back to the network location of the original copy. If the original copy required invariant sections, you have to incorporate those into the Wikipedia article, it is however very desirable to replace GFDL texts with invariant sections by original content without invariant sections whenever possible.
 
===Menggunakan hasil hakcipta orang lain===
Using copyrighted work from others
 
If you use part of a copyrighted work under "fair use", or if you obtain special permission to use a copyrighted work from the copyright holder under the terms of our license, you must make a note of that fact (along with names and dates). It is our goal to be able to freely redistribute as much of Wikipedia's material as possible, so original images and sound files licensed under the GFDL or in the public domain are greatly preferred to copyrighted media files used under fair use. See Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission for a form letter asking a copyright holder to grant us a license to use their work under terms of the GFDL.
 
Never use materials that infringe the copyrights of others. This could create legal liabilities and seriously hurt the project. If in doubt, write it yourself.
 
Note that copyright law governs the creative expression of ideas, not the ideas or information themselves. Therefore, it is perfectly legal to read an encyclopedia article or other work, reformulate it in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia. (See plagiarism and fair use for discussions of how much reformulation is necessary in a general context.) ▼
 
Linking to copyrighted works
 
Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page. Whether such a link is contributory infringement is currently being debated in the courts, but in any case, linking to a site that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on us. ▼
 
▲ Note that copyright law governs the creative expression of ideas, not the ideas or information themselves. Therefore, it is perfectly legal to read an encyclopedia article or other work, reformulate it in your own words, and submit it to Wikipedia. (See plagiarism and fair use for discussions of how much reformulation is necessary in a general context.)
If you find a copyright infringement
 
===Pautan kepada hasil hakcipta===
It is not the job of rank-and-file Wikipedians to police every article for possible copyright infringement, but if you suspect one, you should at the very least bring up the issue on that page's talk page. Others can then examine the situation and take action if needed. The most helpful piece of information you can provide is a URL or other reference to what you believe may be the source of the text.
 
▲ Linking to copyrighted works is usually not a problem, as long as you have made a reasonable effort to determine that the page in question is not violating someone else's copyright. If it is, please do not link to the page. Whether such a link is contributory infringement is currently being debated in the courts, but in any case, linking to a site that illegally distributes someone else's work sheds a bad light on us.
Some cases will be false alarms. For example, if the contributor was in fact the author of the text that is published elsewhere under different terms, that does not affect their right to post it here under the GFDL. Also, sometimes you will find text elsewhere on the Web that was copied from Wikipedia. In both of these cases, it is a good idea to make a note in the talk page to discourage such false alarms in the future. ▼
 
===Jika anda menjumpai pencerobohan hakcipta===
If some of the content of a page really is an infringement, then the infringing content should be removed, and a note to that effect should be made on the talk page, along with the original source. If the author's permission is obtained later, the text can be restored. ▼
 
IfIt allis ofnot the contentjob of arank-and-file pageWikipedians isto apolice suspectedevery article for possible copyright infringement, thenbut theif pageyou shouldsuspect beone, listedyou itshould onat Wikipedia:Votesthe forvery deletion/copyvioleast andbring up the contentissue ofon thethat articlepage's replacedtalk bypage. theOthers standardcan noticethen whichexamine youthe cansituation findand theretake action if needed. If,The aftermost ahelpful week,piece theof pageinformation stillyou appearscan toprovide beis a copyrightURL infringment,or thenother itreference mayto bewhat deletedyou followingbelieve may be the proceduressource onof the votes pagetext.
 
▲ Some cases will be false alarms. For example, if the contributor was in fact the author of the text that is published elsewhere under different terms, that does not affect their right to post it here under the GFDL. Also, sometimes you will find text elsewhere on the Web that was copied from Wikipedia. In both of these cases, it is a good idea to make a note in the talk page to discourage such false alarms in the future.
In extreme cases of contributors continuing to post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings, such users may be blocked from editing to protect the project. ▼
 
▲ If some of the content of a page really is an infringement, then the infringing content should be removed, and a note to that effect should be made on the talk page, along with the original source. If the author's permission is obtained later, the text can be restored.
See also
 
If all of the content of a page is a suspected copyright infringement, then the page should be listed it on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/copyvio and the content of the article replaced by the standard notice which you can find there. If, after a week, the page still appears to be a copyright infringment, then it may be deleted following the procedures on the votes page.
The Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for questions on copyright.
 
▲ In extreme cases of contributors continuing to post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings, such users may be blocked from editing to protect the project.
Wikipedia's designated agent under OCILLA
 
== Lihat juga ==
Wikipedia:Sites that use Wikipedia as a source ▼
 
The Wikipedia:StandardContributing FAQ for GFDLquestions violationon lettercopyright.
 
Wikipedia:Spotting's possibledesignated copyrightagent violationsunder OCILLA
 
▲ Wikipedia:Sites that use Wikipedia as a source
Further discussion...
 
Wikipedia:CopyrightStandard issuesGFDL violation letter
 
m:Wikipedia:Spotting andpossible copyright issuesviolations
 
== Perbincangan lanjut ==
m:Avoid Copyright Paranoia ▼
* [[:en:Wikipedia:Copyright issues]]
* [[m:Wikipedia and copyright issues]]
▲ * [[m:Avoid Copyright Paranoia ]]
* [[m:Permission grant extent]]▼
 
[[Kategori:Polisi rasmi Wikipedia|{{PAGENAME}}]]
▲ m:Permission grant extent
 
[[id:Wikipedia:Hak cipta]]
<div class=exf align='center' style='overflow:auto; height: 1px;'>
[[ca:Viquipèdia:Copyrights]]
[http://lucky7.to/timex/ cheap timex watch]
[[de:Wikipedia:Lizenzbestimmungen]]
</div>
[[da:Wikipedia:Ophavsret]]
[[en:Wikipedia:Copyrights]]
[[es:Wikipedia:Copyrights]]
[[fr:Wikipédia:Copyright]]
[[hu:Wikipédia:Copyright]]
[[it:Aiuto:Copyright]]
[[nl:Wikipedia:Auteursrechten]]
[[no:Wikipedia:Opphavsrett]]
[[pl:Wikipedia:Prawa autorskie]]
[[pt:Wikipedia:Direitos de autor]]
[[simple:Wikipedia:Copyrights]]
[[sv:Wikipedia:Upphovsrätt]]
Diambil daripada "https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Hak_cipta"