Semakan pada 15:54, 11 Jun 2006 sunting Alistair (bincang \| sumb.) 3,214 suntingan Tiada ringkasan suntingan		Semakan pada 16:23, 11 Jun 2006 sunting batalkan Alistair (bincang \| sumb.) 3,214 suntingan Tiada ringkasan suntingan Suntingan berikutnya →
Baris 1: {{panduan}} ------------- Untuk '''beranggapan niat baik''' adalah suatu prinsip asas di [[Wikipedia]]. Oleh kerana kami membenarkan sesiapa sahaja menyunting, ia tentu terikut bahawa kebanyakan orang yang berkerja di sini sedang cuba membantunya, dan bukan cuba memusnahkannya. Jika ini bukan hakikatnya, sudah tentu sebuah projek seperti Wikipedia terhampus dari mula-mula. {{terjemahan}}▼ To '''assume good faith''' is a fundamental principle on [[Wikipedia]]. As we allow anyone to edit, it follows that we assume that most people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. If this weren't true, a project like Wikipedia would be doomed from the beginning. Maka, apabila anda boleh beranggapan secara munasabah bahawa sesuatu itu adalah kesilapan yang tidak disengajakan, betulkan ia tampa melabelkannya sebagai laku musnah atau vandalisme. Apabila anda tidak bersetuju dengan seseorang, ingat bahawa mereka mungkin percaya bahawa mereka sedang cuma membantu. Cubalah selesaikannya dengan menggunakan [[Wikipedia:Laman perbincangan\|laman perbincangan]] untuk menerangkan pendapat sendiri, dan beri peluang kepada yang lainnya untuk berlaku sama. Tindakan ini boleh menggelakkan salah faham dan masalah daripada memuncak. Penting juga untuk mengingati [[Wikipedia:Jangan serang pengguna baru\|polisi larangan serangan keatas pengguna baru]], yang sudah tentu tidak mengetahui akan budaya dan peraturan Wikipedia. So, when you can reasonably assume that something is a well-intentioned error, correct it without just reverting it or labeling it as vandalism. When you disagree with someone, remember that they probably believe that they are helping the project. Consider using [[Wikipedia:talk page\|talk page]]s to explain yourself, and give others the opportunity to do the same. This can avoid misunderstandings and prevent problems from escalating. Especially, remember to [[Wikipedia:Don't bite the newcomers\|be patient with newcomers]], who will be unfamiliar with Wikipedia's culture and rules. Perangai pendatang baru mungkin dianggap sesuai oleh dirinya sendiri dan biasanya memperlihat ketidaktahuan mengenai budaya Wikipedia. Ia tidak jarang untuk seorang pendatang baru untuk mempercayai bahawa suatu polisi yang tidak dikenalinya seharusnya diganti dengan sesuatu yang serupa dengan pengalamannya di tempat lain. Serupa juga apabila pendatang baru membawa pengalaman atau kebolehan bersama mereka dan mereka menanggap hormat yang sepatutnya diberi. Perangai yang berpunca daripada perspektif sebegini tidak semestinya berunsur jahat. A newcomer's behavior probably seems appropriate to him or her and a problem usually indicates unawareness or misunderstanding of Wikipedian culture. It is not uncommon for a newcomer to believe that an unfamiliar policy should be changed to match their experience elsewhere. Similarly, many newcomers bring with them experience or expertise for which they expect immediate respect. Behaviors arising from these perspectives are not necessarily malicious. ''Membetulkan'' kesalahan seseorang (walaupun anda rasa ia sengaja) lebih baik daripada menyalahkannya sebagai menipu kerana orang itu lebih cenderung untuk menerima ia dalam cara yang baik. Membetulkan sepatah ayat yang baru diletakkan yang anda ketahui kesalahannya juga lebih baik daripada cuma memadamkannya. ''Correcting'' someone's error (even if you think it was deliberate) is better than accusing him or her of lying because the person is more likely to take it in a good-natured fashion. Correcting a newly added sentence that you know to be wrong is also much better than simply deleting it. Menanggap niat baik, seperti namanya, adalah mengenai niat, bukan kelakukan. Sifat melakukan kesilapan adalah sifat manusia kebanyakan, termasuk orang yang berniat baik, dan anda seharusnya memperbetulkan mereka apabila mereka melakukannya. '''Jangan''' berlaku seperti kesalahan mereka adalah sengaja. Betulkan, tetapi jangan menyindir. Tentunya ada penyumbang di Wikipedia ini yang tidak menyetujui anda. Walaupun mereka salah, ia tidak bermaknya mereka sedang cuba musnahkan projek. Adanya sesetengah orang yang susah berkerja dengan anda, dan itu juga tidak bermaksud mereka sedang cuba memusnahkan projek ini juga. Jika mereka menaikkan kemarahan anda sekalipun, ia tidak pernah perlu untuk mengatakan bahawa kelakuan mereka berniat jahat kerana semua tindakan balas (contoh: mengembalikan laman, menyekat) boleh dilakukan berdasarkan perangai berbanding tujuan. Assuming good faith is about ''intentions'', not actions. Well-meaning people make mistakes, and you should correct them when they do. You should '''not''' act like their mistake was deliberate. Correct, but don't scold. There will be people on Wikipedia with whom you disagree. Even if they're wrong, that doesn't mean they're trying to wreck the project. There will be some people with whom you find it hard to work. That doesn't mean they're trying to wreck the project either. However, if it means they annoy you, it is never necessary that we attribute an editor's actions to bad faith, even if bad faith seems obvious, as all our countermeasures (i.e. reverting, blocking) can be performed on the basis of behavior rather than intent. ~~When~~Apabila [[Wikipedia:~~edit~~Perang ~~war~~sunting\|~~edit~~perang-perang ~~war~~sunting]]s ~~get~~menjadi ~~hot~~panas, ~~it's~~ia ~~easy~~mudah tountuk ~~forget~~lupa tomengenai ~~assume~~anggapan ~~good~~niat ~~faith~~baik. Jika anda beranggapan niat jahat, beberapa perkara mungkin berlaku: ~~If you assume bad faith, several things may happen:~~ ▲{{terjemahan}} * [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks\|Personal attacks]]: Once you've made a personal attack, the target will probably assume bad faith. The edit war will get even uglier. Baris 24: This policy does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of evidence to the contrary. Things which can cause the loss of good faith include vandalism, personal attacks, sockpuppetry and edit warring. Assuming good faith also does not mean that no action by editors should be criticized, it only means that one should not ascribe said action to malice. Automatically accusing the other side in a conflict of not assuming good faith regardless of their motivation is failing to assume good faith in itself. ==~~See~~Lihat ~~also~~juga== * [[Hanlon's Razor\|Hanlon's razor]] * Other related policies and guidelines advising what to do (and what ''not'' to do), to help demonstrate that you are editing in good faith: Baris 34: [[Wikipedia:Assume bad faith]] (a parody of this page) [[Wikipedia:No angry mastodons]] * Rencana mengenai [[niat baik]] ==~~External~~Pautan ~~links~~luar== * [[MeatBall:AssumeGoodFaith]] * [[m:WikipediAhimsa]] [[Kategori:Garis panduan Wikipedia\|Anggaplah niat baik]] ~~[[Category:Wikipedia guidelines\|Assume good faith]]~~ [[da:Wikipedia:Forvent, at andre er i god tro]]

Wikipedia:Anggaplah niat baik: Perbezaan antara semakan