Wikipedia

Pesawat pengebom: Perbezaan antara semakan

Layar sejarah secara interaktif
← Suntingan sebelumnyaSuntingan berikutnya →
Kandungan dihapus Kandungan ditambah
VisualWikiteks
Yosri (bincang | sumb.)
Birokrat, Penyelia
245,308 suntingan
Tiada ringkasan suntingan
Yosri (bincang | sumb.)
Birokrat, Penyelia
245,308 suntingan
Mendaftarlah sebagai penyumbang agar anda mudah dikenali.
Baris 19:
 
 
InDalam moderntentera airudara forcesmoden, theperbezaan distinctionantara between bomberspengebom, fighterpejuang-bomberspengebom, anddan attackpesawat aircraftserangan hasdarat becomesemakin blurrykabur. ManyBanyak attackpesawat aircraft,penyerang evendarat oneswalaupun thatyang ''look''menyerupai likepejuang fighters,dioptima arebagi optimizedmenggugurkan to drop bombsbom, with very little abilitydengan tokeupayaan engagepertempuran inudara aerialyang combatrendah. Indeed, the design qualities that make an effective low-level attack aircraft make for a distinctly inferior air superiority fighter, and vice versa. Conversely, many fighter aircraft, such as the [[F-16]], are often used as 'bomb trucks,' despite being designed for aerial combat. Perhaps the one meaningful distinction at present is the question of range: a bomber is generally a long-range aircraft capable of striking targets deep within enemy territory, whereas fighter bombers and attack aircraft are limited to 'theater' missions in and around the immediate area of battlefield combat. Even that distinction is muddied by the availability of [[aerial refueling]], which greatly increases the potential radius of combat operations.
 
Pembangunan pesawat pengebom strategik besar terbantut pada akhir [[Perang Dingin]] akibat peningkatan kos dan kemajuan [[Peluru berpandu balistik jarak benua]], yang dianggap mempunyai nilai (''deterrence'') yang sama dan lebih sukar dipintas. Program [[USAF]] [[XB-70 Valkyrie]] dibatalkan diatas sebab yang serupa pada awal [[1960-an]], dan kemudiannya pesawat [[B-1 Lancer]] dan [[B-2 Spirit]] memasuki perkhidmatan selepas masaalah politik dan pembangunan yang berpanjangan. Kos yang tinggi bererti hanya sedikit dihasilkan dan B-52 yang direka sekitar [[1950-an]] terus digunakan sehingga abad ke 21. Samajuga [[Soviet Union]] menggunakan jarak serdahana [[Tupolev Tu-22M]] pada [[197-an]], tetapi pengebom [[nombor Mach|Mach 3]] tidak berhasil. The Mach 2 [[Tupolev Tu-160]] was built only in tiny numbers, leaving the earlier [[Tupolev Tu-16]] and [[Tupolev Tu-95]] heavy bombers of [[1950s]] vintage to soldier on into the 21st century. Meanwhile, the [[United Kingdom|British]] strategic bombing force largely came to an end with the phase-out of the [[V Bomber]] force (the last of which left service in [[1983 in aviation|1983]]. The only other nation that fields a strategic bombing force at present is the [[People's Republic of China]], which has a number of Chinese-built [[Tupolev Tu-16]]s.
Diambil daripada "https://ms.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pesawat_pengebom"