Semakan pada 04:28, 11 September 2005 sunting Yosri (bincang \| sumb.) Birokrat, Penyelia 245,308 suntingan Mendaftarlah sebagai penyumbang agar anda mudah dikenali. ← Suntingan sebelumnya		Semakan pada 12:36, 15 November 2005 sunting batalkan Wizwiz (bincang \| sumb.) 6 suntingan Tiada ringkasan suntingan Suntingan berikutnya →
Baris 19: Dalam tentera udara moden, perbezaan antara pengebom, pejuang-pengebom, dan pesawat serangan darat semakin kabur. Banyak pesawat penyerang darat walaupun yang menyerupai pejuang dioptima bagi menggugurkan bom, dengan keupayaan pertempuran udara yang rendah. Indeed, the design qualities that make an effective low-level attack aircraft make for a distinctly inferior air superiority fighter, and vice versa. ~~Conversely~~Sebaliknya, ~~many~~banyak ~~fighter~~pesawat ~~aircraft~~pejuang, ~~such as the~~sebagai contoh[[F-16]], ~~are~~kerap ~~often~~kali ~~used~~digunakan asseperti `trak bom' (bomb trucks),' ~~despite~~walau pun sebenarnya ~~being~~direka ~~designed~~untuk ~~for~~pertempuran ~~aerial~~di ~~combat~~udara. Perhaps the one meaningful distinction at present is the question of range: a bomber is generally a long-range aircraft capable of striking targets deep within enemy territory, whereas fighter bombers and attack aircraft are limited to 'theater' missions in and around the immediate area of battlefield combat. Even that distinction is muddied by the availability of [[aerial refueling]], which greatly increases the potential radius of combat operations. Pembangunan pesawat pengebom strategik besar terbantut pada akhir [[Perang Dingin]] akibat peningkatan kos dan kemajuan [[Peluru berpandu balistik jarak benua]], yang dianggap mempunyai nilai (''deterrence'') yang sama dan lebih sukar dipintas. Program [[USAF]] [[XB-70 Valkyrie]] dibatalkan diatas sebab yang serupa pada awal [[1960-an]], dan kemudiannya pesawat [[B-1 Lancer]] dan [[B-2 Spirit]] memasuki perkhidmatan selepas masaalah politik dan pembangunan yang berpanjangan. Kos yang tinggi bererti hanya sedikit dihasilkan dan B-52 yang direka sekitar [[1950-an]] terus digunakan sehingga abad ke 21. Samajuga [[Soviet Union]] menggunakan jarak serdahana [[Tupolev Tu-22M]] pada [[197-an]], tetapi pengebom [[nombor Mach\|Mach 3]] tidak berhasil. The Mach 2 [[Tupolev Tu-160]] was built only in tiny numbers, leaving the earlier [[Tupolev Tu-16]] and [[Tupolev Tu-95]] heavy bombers of [[1950s]] vintage to soldier on into the 21st century. Meanwhile, the [[United Kingdom\|British]] strategic bombing force largely came to an end with the phase-out of the [[V Bomber]] force (the last of which left service in [[1983 in aviation\|1983]]. The only other nation that fields a strategic bombing force at present is the [[People's Republic of China]], which has a number of Chinese-built [[Tupolev Tu-16]]s.

Pesawat pengebom: Perbezaan antara semakan