==Sebab-sebab menyokong dan membangkang penubuhan==
Hujah yang menyokong penubuhan mahkamah adalah bahawa peranan [[House of Lords]] sebagai [[legislatur]] dan [[kehakiman]] harus dipisahkan. Ia dihujah yang ini mengelirukan orang ramai dan bertentangan dengan prinsip [[pembahagian kuasa]]. Hujah yang menyokong sistem dulu dikekalkan adalah bahawa ia berkesan dan menjimatkan kos.
The main argument in favour of establishing the court was that the House of Lords' role as a [[legislature]] and [[judiciary]] should be separated. It was claimed this confused people and was contrary to the principles of [[separation of powers]] (the idea that in a [[democracy]], the [[Executive (government)|executive]], legislative and judicial powers should be held by separate actors). The main argument against the court was that the previous system had worked well and kept costs down.
TheRancangan Government'sKerajaan plansuntuk tomenubuhkan createMahkamah theAgung Supremeyang Court,dibuat announcedpada inbulan JuneJun 2003,weremengundang controversialkontroversi anddan weretidak broughtditanyakan forwarddahulu. withPada little consultation. Duringtahun 2004, asatu selectjawatankuasa committeekhas of thedari House of Lords scrutinised the arguments formenilai andhujah againstmenyokong settingdan upmembangkang apenubuhan newmahkamah courtbaru.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldselect/ldcref/125/12505.htm |title=Lords Select Committee on the Constitutional Reform Bill First Report}}</ref>
