Kes pemecatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia 1998: Perbezaan antara semakan

Kandungan dihapus Kandungan ditambah
Yosri (bincang | sumb.)
Baris 11:
* Anwar juga gagal memansuhkan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi itu selepas Mahkamah Rayuan pada 25 April 2007 menolak rayuannya dan mengesahkan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi itu.<ref>[http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/bm/news_lite.php?id=412623 Kes Saman Anwar Terhadap Dr Mahathir Didengar 30 Julai]</ref>
 
Hakim Mahkamah Rayuan Tengku Baharuddin Shah Tengku Mahmud bersetuju dengan Hakim Abdul Hamid sementara hakim Mahkamah Kebangsaan Hakim Rahmah Hussain menolahnya.
“Even though reading the appeal record, we find EVIDENCE TO CONFIRM that the appellants (Anwar dan Sukma) were involved in homosexual activities and we are more inclined to believe that the alleged incident at Tivoli Villa did happen sometime, this court, as a court of law, may only convict the appellants if the prosecution has successfully proved that the alleged offences as stated in the charge, beyond reasonable doubt”.[http://nmjnh.wordpress.com/2008/07/04/komen-chedet-pasal-kes-liwat-anwar/]
 
Hakim Abdul Hamid Mohamad menyatakan bahawa berdasarkan rekod rayuan, dia mendapati bukti perayu terbabit dalam aktiviti homoseksual dan cenderung untuk percaya kejadian di Tivoli Villa pernah berlaku.
 
Bagaimanapun, pihak pendakwaraya perlu membuktikan kesalahan yang dituduh berdasarkan '''bukti yang boleh diterima pakai oleh Mahkamah berdasarkan prinsip undang-undang'''.”.<ref>[http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/6/29/nation/20080629114410 Anwar receives death threats, in hiding (Update 3)]</ref>
 
==Rujukan==